I have been questioned privately by friends, colleagues and
associates about my concern on the imbroglio between the state of Qatar and the
kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Someone even claimed that my sympathy for the state of
Qatar is informed by my loyalty to the Muslim Brotherhood movement. Well, in a
situation like this, assumptions and accusations cannot take the place of facts
and axioms.


I am not a member of the Brotherhood movement and I have no any
interaction with the Nigerian groups that claim allegiance to the movement,
beyond the mere fraternity that exists amongst brothers of the same faith. All
the teachers of Islamic creed in Nigeria are my brothers. I respect them. I
admire them, and I have always interacted with all of them, including those in
the Salafi class and the haraki trend!


I have greatly benefited from the work of Shaykh Yuusuf
Alqaradawiy, particularly his research on different areas of Fiqh Waaqi' and
the contemporary Islamic thoughts. But there is hardly a contemporary scholar
whose love has completely overwhelmed my heart like the distinguished scholar,
Shaykh Muhammad Saalih Al-Uthaymin. You can check it out by comparing his works
with those of his contemporaries in the same school, you'll find a
conspicuously unique scholar in all areas of Islamic thoughts!


However, my love for these scholars shouldn't deprive me of my
own personality as Abdur Rauf Saheed, a Nigerian Muslim researcher in global
politics; a dawah activist, whose interest cut across all areas of Muslims'
concern; a business man, whose occasional sojourn traverses the Middle-East and
its environ, particularly the gulf. No! My respect for the holy sanctuaries, Bn
Baaz, Al-Uthaymin and even Al-Qaradhawi shouldn't becloud my mental space. I am
"me" and they are "themselves", they'll not render my own
account in the day of judgement. May Allah be pleased with them all.


I really sympathize with all my brothers whose role models are
the Saudi's scholars. I can feel their pain, they are indeed embarrassed by
this Saudi's shameless dance in the market place, more so that the Mufti Shaykh
Al-Shaykh had to legitimize the shameful act with a spurious verdict. It's a
pathetic situation which no any reasonable person, with a sense of modesty, can
ever defend. So, my brothers have no any option in this regard than to resort
to calling the crisis a fitan that requires our collective silence.


Even lately, a brother I love so much had said the crisis (which
has already divided the Ummah) does not concern us. Then, what's our concern
with the world around us if this doesn't concern us? Was it the Americans'
election of Trump which attracted our attention last year that really concern
us? I can feel your pain, brother. Who would ever pray to be put to shame by
his blind allegiance to a kingdom that is foolishly subservient to the enemies?


Those who are well conversant with the contemporary history of
Islam will boldly testify to how the kingdom has been consistently manipulated
by the West. From the era of the fall of caliphacy till date, it has always
been a story of back-stabbing, betrayals and deceits in the peninsula. The West
knows how foolish we are, they only fear the progressive Muslim thinkers
amongst us - Those who think beyond the rudiments of the five daily obligatory
prayers, those who seek Islamisation of the polity are not cordoned by the


I am not therefore surprised if the Brotherhood movement is the
ultimate target of the whole crisis. At what stage did a movement that partakes
in democratic processes become a terrorist group? Can a movement with a large
parliamentarian representation in Jordan and Bahrain be called a terrorist
group? Is it possible that members of a terrorist group would fold their arms
and watch themselves killed; their wealth and property confiscated and their
wives and children thrown into deadly dungeons as it happened in Egypt? Allah
will definitely judge this Saudi's claim!


And about the Shaykh, I still marvel at the Muslim world's
thought system. What could have ever made a distinguished scholar whose major
"fault", as always analysed by the Saudi clergy, is his liberal
approache to jurispudential issues, a terrorist? You call Qaradhawi a liberal
scholar who trivializes serious jurispudential facts, and yet you call him a
radical. Nothing radicalises as much as the Saudi's teachings of pristine
Islam. Give someone the right Tawheed, and watch him stand against anything but
Allah. What a commendable radical phenomenon!


Qaradhawi has been teaching Islam in Qatar for more than three
decades, and no one (single) Qatari has ever partaken in any major terrorist
act. From the 9/11 disaster, to Al-Qaeda networks and the ISIS camps in the
Levant, thousands of Saudis are involved. On several occasions, I have been told
by the exuberant Saudi youths, who drive their parents' luxury cars as taxicab
during vacations, of how much they love Bn Laden and how much of hatred they
bear against the state. I always wonder if those boys were not taught in school
to be absolutely loyal, even in distress!


By Allah, in whose hand is my soul, the United States'
administration, as well as the CIA is not unaware of this little fact,
including the difference between the Saudi's anti Bidi'ah, Tawheedi orientation
and Qaradhawi's fiqh waaqi'. They know which one has the potential of
radicalising the Muslim minds and which one is dangerous to their own global
political hegemony. The CIA has the records of the Qatari's annual budget on
both social and scientific research and it is equally aware of how subservient
is the Saudi kingdom to the American authority. It is just a matter of
finishing with one before annihilating the other!


Definitely, Trump has his own mission. During his campaign, we
all heard him saying that Saudi Arabia hated America so much and was behind
9/11. We've however just heard a new pop music from the white supremacist who
now sees the kingdom as the bedrock of regional security and moderation,
America's best friend and foremost ally in the "war on terror". In a
similar approach, less than two weeks after calling Qatar a "crucial
strategic partner" in his Riyadh speech, and boasting of selling it some
"beautiful" American weapons, he suddenly began to jeer against it,
accusing Doha of supporting terrorism.

But, is Qatar truly a terrorist state? Some guys are bittered
for whatever reason and they wouldn't mind bringing the entire human race to an
involuntary halt, if nobody is prepared to give a listening ear. They've tried
it on several occasions. They collapsed skyscrapers, killed people in millions
in different operations. Whether they are wrong or right, the world must feel
secure. It all seems crazy, but they are not mad. They have families like you
and I - wives, children, parents, cousins, uncles and aunties. Thus, they would
probably listen if someone reasonable is also willing to give them a listening
ear, and Qatar did. Does that make it a terrorist state?


In the words of the analyst, Marwaan Bisharah, "Qatar has
$30bn worth of investments in the United States and stands out as the host of
the largest American military base in the Middle East, from which much of the
"war on terror" is being fought in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. Thus,
most of the trumped up charges against Qatar are either demonstrably thin,
false or totally irrational. For example, the Saudi monarchy accuses Qatar of
supporting the Taliban because it opened an office for the Afghan insurgency,
when in fact it did so at the behest of the US administration to facilitate
peace talks".


Would you call the United States a terrorist nation for hosting
the same Taliban leaders in Washington immediately they flushed out the
northern alliance from Kabul? It sounds so ridiculous when I heard that Qatar
is also accused of backing the anti-regime militants in Syria, and I wonder if
Saudi Arabia was not the major financier of An-Nusra, a significant part of
which had later collapsed into ISIS. General Joseph Vogel, chief of the US
military's Central Command, had once written that Qatar is indeed a "key
and critical" ally that could be of much help in facilitating a
sustainable deal in Syria".


I have not found any of these allegations as stupid as the one
that bothers on Qatar's diplomatic ties with Iran. This allegation is so
nauseating that it provokes my vomit, as it clearly stupifies most of us who
claim to be Sunnis in creed, but with strong acrimony against the Iranian
Shites. We know of Fiqh, a'qeedah and ma'malaat, but how much of siyaasat Al
A'lamiyah do we know? And then easily, we fall for any political deception
orchestrated by the Saudi monarchy.


I must clearly affirm from the onset that I hate that sick
ideology called Shiism. I am not comfortable with those who curse and ridicule
my symbols of faith and piety, my heroes and models - the companions of the holy
Prophet Muhammad. I fought to the last, with all my strength, a certain Shiite
Imam in my neighbourhood in Lagos, not because I hated him, but simply because
he was a Shiite. He was indeed a man I respected, and he reciprocated in kind,
until his creed became my object of attack!


However, the Saudi's politics with Iran is not about this
ideology, but rather, it is a regional politics of the power play, involving
the US. In the region, Saudi Arabia is never secure with the Iranian military
might. But if Iran could just play the diplomacy of humility in its
relationship with the Saudi kingdom, the game will change. We had a similar
example in the days of Khatami, the liberal president of Iran who came on board
with a campaign for dialogue among civilization. On this basis, he was able to
reach out to the United States, hitherto called the Great Satan by Khomeini;
the Vatican, the European Union and the Sunni enclave, Saudi Arabia,

It was of course not by any means astounding to some
international politics analysts that president Khatami could easily win the
diplomatic loyalties of these avowed enemies of his country, with his
liberalisation policy, but it indeed baffled every watcher of Saudi's foreign
policy that the house of Saud could easily be swayed into befriending the
enemies of the companions. Nevertheless, the whole scenario was, to me, very
interesting, because I know the Saudis too well.


It is interesting to know that, the United States, amongst the
historic aftermaths of this iranian policy, gladly welcomed president Khatami
on a state visit to Washington and the Saudi kingdom also enjoyed the
diplomatic ties with Tehran, with an astronomical boost in trade and social
interactions. They knew that Khatami was a Shiite, an ayotollahi professor of
philosophy, and that his subjects, the unrepentant Iranians, were still
predominantly the Shiites who cursed the companions; but the monarchy shifted
its gaze away and no scholar could dare the state power.


However, something occurred in the era of this unusual
diplomatic romance which many observers, especially Muslims, had thought would
shatter Iran's diplomatic relations with Saudi Arabia. Of course, I was in
Umrah and i did withness it. It was during a ziyaarah procession at the
prophet's grave inside the holy sanctuary in Medina, a notorious Shite cleric
from Iran after saying his salaam to the holy Prophet, walked towards Abubakri
and Umar's graves and then spat heavily on them in disgust. The organized queue
of the belivers was enraged and the cursed iranian cleric was almost lynched,
but for his immediate rescue by the Saudi police.


The day after was a Friday which the Saudis and other visitors
to the Prophet's mosque would not forget in a hurry, as the famous Imam
Hudhaifi climbed the pulpit to deliver a powerful, historic Friday sermon,
tongue-lashing the kingdom's leadership for its newly found satanic friendship
with the Shites who came visiting, desecrating the two leading companions'
graves. The khutbah was so severe, and immediately after he said his tasleem,
which heralded the two rakat prayer to an end, he was whisked away by the state
security agency for interrogation. Yet, this infuriating event didn't frustrate
the ties!


Therefore, if Qatar is pressured by Saudi Arabia to disengage
with Iran, it's not about the creed of Shiism. In fact, the Saudi monarchy
doesn't love Islam as much as its ultra conservative scholars do. It's all
about the kingdom's interest and a foreign policy engendered by regional
politics. Of course, in the region, Iran is right now winning, with a strategic
military support from Russia, as it now diplomatically superintends over both
Iraq and Syria, the two Shia ruled countries that ordinarily cut the interest
of both the United States and Saudi Arabia.


Unfortunately, in spite of the kingdom's abundance of wealth and
its goodwill of Muslim solidarity, the virtual lack of experience in
international diplomacy on the part of its new crown Prince, Muhammad Bn
Salman, under whose ego lies the entire crisis, the kingdom has become a losing
giant in the region as much as it is frustrated!


Thus, going through the newly released list of those thirteen
demands sent to Qatar, as well as the ten day ultimatum attached, it doesn't
take much technicalities in the knowledge of diplomacy and global poolitics to
conclude that the kingdom is far removed from matching its counterparts in the
game of power-play. Its demands are smacks of total hypocrisy, sans a touch of

Abu Mazeedatil khayr Bn Sa'eed 26/6/17


See all 843   Recent News


Members of the Islamic Movement of Nigeri...More...
Churches To Become Islamic Centre In Iwo...
Churches To Become Islamic Centre In Iwo

Enrol your children now!!!...
Enrol your children now!!!

Daarul Hijrah school of Quranic memorization...More...
Taawun President Presents Honorary Award...
Taawun President Presents Honorary Award


Let's unite against our enemies.

To those who ar...More...

وسط غياب عربي.. أميركا ...
وسط غياب عربي.. أميركا وروس...More...
Obituary: Egypt's first freely elected P...
Obituary: Egypt's first freely elected President Mohamed Morsi

The Muslim Brotherhood ...More...
© 2019, Jama'atu Ta'awunil Muslimeen.
All righs reserved.